CPC
'Taxing Justice At Ad-Valorem Rates Is Harsh': Allahabad High Court Urges UP Govt To Ease Burden Of Civil Litigation
Observing that taxing justice at "ad valorem rates is, indeed, harsh", the Allahabad High Court on Tuesday urged the Uttar Pradesh Government to consider measures to reduce the hardship faced by litigants pursuing civil remedies.At the same time, the Court made it clear that disputes over title and possession cannot be decided by administrative authorities and must be taken before the...
O VII 7 CPC | Lesser Relief Can Be Decreed, But Not Totally Different Claim : Supreme Court Declines To Allow Partition In Title Suit
Declining to grant the relief of partition in a suit seeking a declaration of title, the Supreme Court clarified that while Order VII Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits the grant of a lesser or alternative relief flowing from the facts already pleaded and proved, it cannot be invoked to award a relief such as partition, which is based on a distinct cause of action and requires...
UP Tenancy Act | Third Party Claiming Independent Title Not A Necessary Or Proper Party To Eviction Proceedings: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has held that a third party asserting an independent title adverse to the landlord is neither a necessary nor a proper party to proceedings under Section 21 of the U.P. Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021.It held that questions of title cannot be brought into eviction proceedings through an application for impleadment under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of...
Res Judicata Applies To Successive Impleadment Applications Under Different CPC Provisions: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Monday (July 27) held that where an application for impleadment has been rejected on merits under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC, a subsequent application seeking the same relief under Order XXII Rule 10 of the CPC would be barred by the doctrine of res judicata, provided it is based on the same cause, between the same parties litigating under the same title, and is decided by...
NALSAR Student Detained For Attendance Shortage Can't Take Supplementary Exams; Sympathy Can't Override Academic Rules: Telangana High Court
The Telangana High Court has refused to direct NALSAR University of Law to permit an MBA student to appear in supplementary examinations after she was detained for shortage of attendance due to prolonged illness. [2026 LiveLaw (Tel) 120]Holding that sympathy and equitable considerations cannot override mandatory academic regulations, the Court ruled that a student barred from writing...
Rajasthan High Court Seeks JDA's Response On Delay In Constructing Drain Channels Along Dravyavati River Despite NEERI Report
The Rajasthan High Court has directed the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) to explain why cement concrete drain channels have not been constructed along stretches of the Dravyavati River in Jaipur despite recommendations made in a report by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nagpur. The Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and...
O.7 R.11 CPC | Plaint Can Only Be Rejected Based On Its Own Averments, Defendant's Stand Immaterial: Andhra Pradesh High Court
The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC only if, on a plain reading of its averments, it discloses no cause of action or is barred by law. [2026 LiveLaw (2026) 153]Dismissing a challenge to the refusal to reject a plaint in a partition suit, the Court held that the plaintiff's earlier plea of oral partition in previous litigation did not,...
Santal Mission Of Northern Churches Dispute | Jharkhand High Court Holds Declaration Against 1968 Transfer Barred By Limitation, Non-Joinder
The Jharkhand High Court has dismissed two Letters Patent Appeals arising from disputes over the properties of the Santal Mission of Northern Churches, holding that although a suit instituted under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure was maintainable, no case was made out to declare a 1968 Instrument of Transfer illegal, inoperative or non-binding.A Division Bench of Chief Justice...
Order Issuing Notice On Temporary Injunction Plea Not Appealable Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court has recently held that an order passed by a trial court, which only issues notice on an application for temporary injunction, would not constitute an appealable order under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the CPC. [2026 LiveLaw (Kar) 265]The single judge bench of Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur, dismissing a batch of four appeals filed by plaintiffs, held that a trial court...
Swadeshi Jurisprudence And Colonial Afterlife Of Order XXI
In civil matters, the separation of judgment from enforcement is not a colonial peculiarity. The idea is much older and can be traced at least to Roman law. In classical Roman procedure, a judgment, called the iudicatum, did not enforce itself. Instead, it created a new obligation known as the obligatio iudicati, treated as a debt arising from the judgment itself. If the debtor did not pay...











