State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. v. Ghulam Mohd. Tantray 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 237

Bittu Ram v. UT of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 238

Riyaz Ahmad Hajam & Anr. v. Union Territory through SHO Police Station Uri District Baramulla 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 239

State of J&K Through Senior Superintendent of Police, Kathua v. Balwinder Kumar Alias Bittu 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 240

Union Territory of J&K & Ors. v. Fayaz Ahmad Bhat & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 241

Ali Mohammad Dar v. Union Territory of J&K & Anr. connected with Muzamilla v. State (UT of J&K) 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 242

Kewal Sharma v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 243

Maqbool Buhroo and Others v. Ahad Buhroo and Others 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 244

S.D. Mevada & Anr. v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir Through Food Safety Officer, Block Shopian 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 245

Assadullah Wagay and Others v. State 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 246

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex NK Roshan Lal 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 247

Ghulam Rasool Rather & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Revenue & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 248

State of J&K Through Police Station Gangyal v. Mohd. Irfan 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 249

UT of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. v. Mohd. Shafi Yatoo & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 250

Mohammad Ameen War v. State of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 251

Kamran Mushtaq v. UT of J&K 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 252

Yawar Ahmad Bhagat v. UT of J&K through P/S Yaripora 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 253

Makhan Din v. Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 254

Judgments/Orders:

Enemy Infiltrated Govt Through Employees To Advance Terror Agenda: J&K&L High Court Upholds Constable's Dismissal For Sheltering Militant

Case Title: State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. v. Ghulam Mohd. Tantray

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 237

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh upheld the dismissal of a police constable who was found involved in anti-national activities, observing that the enemy had been using multiple tools and strategies to disintegrate the nation by infiltrating the Government through its employees and members of the security forces.

“Ordinary Citizen Not Supposed To Know Full Form Of BNSS Unless Informed”: J&KL High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order

Case Title: Bittu Ram v. UT of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 238

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh quashed a preventive detention order passed under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978, observing that an ordinary citizen is not supposed to know the full form or meaning of the abbreviation 'BNSS' unless law enforcement agencies and the concerned magistrate disclose it.

Provision To Extend Investigation Time Under NDPS Act Applies Even In Narco-Terror Cases Under UAPA: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Riyaz Ahmad Hajam & Anr. v. Union Territory through SHO Police Station Uri District Baramulla

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 239

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, though both special enactments, operate in distinct legislative fields and are required to be harmoniously construed.

Ante-Dated FIR Renders Investigation Tainted & Unsafe To Rely Upon: J&K&L High Court Upholds Acquittal In Murder Case

Case Title: State of J&K Through Senior Superintendent of Police, Kathua v. Balwinder Kumar Alias Bittu

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 240

Holding that an ante-dated First Information Report casts serious doubt on the genuineness and spontaneity of the prosecution case and renders the ensuing investigation tainted, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh upheld the acquittal of a man accused of murder.

Equal Pay For Equal Work Applies Irrespective Of Funding Source: J&K&L High Court Upholds Enhanced Remuneration For Vocational Instructors

Case Title: Union Territory of J&K & Ors. v. Fayaz Ahmad Bhat & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 241

Reiterating that employees performing identical duties cannot be paid differently merely because their remuneration originates from different sources, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh upheld the entitlement of Vocational Instructors engaged under the Self-Finance Scheme in Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) to enhanced remuneration under an Government Order.

Witnesses Informed By Police About Accused Before Statements Recorded: J&K&L High Court Acquits Murder Convicts

Case Title: Ali Mohammad Dar v. Union Territory of J&K & Anr. connected with Muzamilla v. State (UT of J&K)

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 242

Holding that a prosecution case becomes seriously suspect when witnesses are already informed by the police about the identity of the alleged offenders before their statements are recorded, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh set aside the conviction of two persons sentenced to life imprisonment for murder.

'Prosecution Examined Barely Two Witnesses Per Annum': J&K&L High Court Grants Bail To Murder Accused After 11 Years In Custody

Case Title: Kewal Sharma v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 243

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court granted bail to an accused facing trial under Sections 302 and 201 RPC after observing that the prosecution had consumed more than eleven years to examine only twenty-four witnesses and had failed to conclude evidence despite repeated opportunities.

Mere Mention Of Word 'Dead' In Small Font Against Party's Name Doesn't Satisfy Duty To Inform Under Order 22 Rule 10-A CPC: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Maqbool Buhroo and Others v. Ahad Buhroo and Others

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 244

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that merely mentioning the word “dead” against the name of a deceased respondent in a small font, without specifying the date of death, does not amount to compliance with the obligation cast upon counsel under Rule 10-A of Order XXII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Food Sample Can Be Referred To Referral Laboratory Without Prior Hearing If Designated Officer Records Reasons: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: S.D. Mevada & Anr. v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir Through Food Safety Officer, Block Shopian

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 245

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that where a Designated Officer records reasons showing that an initial food analysis report is incomplete or erroneous due to omission of crucial safety parameters, the sample can validly be referred to a Referral Laboratory under Rule 2.4.3 of the Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011, and no prior hearing to the food business operator is required before such referral.

J&K&L High Court Quashes FIR Over Alleged Encroachment On Evacuee Property, Says Cognisance Barred Without Complaint By Competent Authority

Case Title: Assadullah Wagay and Others v. State

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 246

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court quashed an FIR and all consequential proceedings against few persons who were charged under Sections 447 and 186 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 18 of the J&K State Evacuees (Administration of Property) Act, Svt. 2006, holding that the Trial Court had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the said offences on the basis of a police report in the absence of a written complaint by the competent authority.

Disability Developed After 14 Years Of Army Service Presumed Attributable To Service Absent Cogent Rebuttal: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Union of India & Ors. v. Ex NK Roshan Lal

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 247

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court upheld an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal granting disability element of pension to Army personnel after observing that the disability had developed during service after more than fourteen years of enrolment and that the subsequent denial of attributability lacked adequate reasoning.

Land Revenue Act | Revisional Powers U/S 15 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time; Unexplained 20-Year Delay Impermissible: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Ghulam Rasool Rather & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Revenue & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 248

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh quashed an order passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue) setting aside a mutation attested in the year 2004, holding that the revision petition filed in 2021 after a lapse of nearly twenty years was barred by unreasonable delay.

Mere Assertion That Accused Opted For Search Before Gazetted Officer Does Not Establish Compliance With S.50 NDPS Act: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: State of J&K Through Police Station Gangyal v. Mohd. Irfan

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 249

Holding that mere assertion that an accused opted to be searched before a Gazetted Officer does not by itself establish compliance with Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh observed that the prosecution must further prove through consistent and reliable evidence that the search was actually conducted before or by such officer.

Contractual Professionals Not Entitled To Remuneration Beyond Contract Period Without Proof Of Work Performed: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: UT of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. v. Mohd. Shafi Yatoo & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 250

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh set aside a writ Court order directing payment of remuneration to contractual professionals engaged for preparation of zonal plans, holding that the respondents miserably failed to demonstrate that they performed any duties beyond the period of their contract.

High Court Cannot Conduct Enquiry Into Whether Building Deviations Are Minor Or Major; Remedy Lies Before Special Tribunal: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Mohammad Ameen War v. State of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 251

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a writ petition challenging a revised building permission order issued by the Srinagar Municipal Corporation regularizing alleged deviations in construction, holding that the High Court does not have any mechanism or yardstick to conduct a roving enquiry into the question whether a deviation is minor or major in nature.

Mere Receipt Of Money Without Evidence Of Utilisation For Financing Illicit Trafficking Does Not Attract S.27A NDPS Act: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Kamran Mushtaq v. UT of J&K

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 252

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh set aside an order cancelling bail granted to an accused facing trial under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, holding that the concept of “financing illicit traffic” under Section 27-A is distinct from merely receiving consideration for the sale of narcotic substances.

Love Affair, Not Statutory Rape: J&K&L High Court Acquits Man After Finding Prosecutrix's Minority Not Proved

Case Title: Yawar Ahmad Bhagat v. UT of J&K through P/S Yaripora

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 253

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh set aside the conviction of a man under Section 376 of the Ranbir Penal Code for alleged statutory rape, holding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the prosecutrix was a minor on the date of the occurrence.

Failure Of Bail Cancellation Followed By Preventive Detention Is 'Antithetical'; J&K&L High Court Quashes PIT-NDPS Detention

Case Title: Makhan Din v. Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 254

Holding that preventive detention cannot be sustained where the detaining authority is kept unaware that the prosecution had already failed in its attempt to secure cancellation of the detenue's bail, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh observed that a situation where cancellation of bail does not succeed but the person is thereafter subjected to preventive detention custody is “antithetical” in nature.