Should Tarun Tejpal Surrender For His Appeal Against Rape Sentence To Be Listed? Supreme Court To Consider

Gursimran Kaur Bakshi

24 Aug 2026 4:12 PM IST

  • Should Tarun Tejpal Surrender For His Appeal Against Rape Sentence To Be Listed? Supreme Court To Consider
    Listen to this Article

    The Supreme Court today(August 24) said that it will pass orders on former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal's application for exemption from surrendering after the Bombay High Court convicted and sentenced him to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment in the 2013 rape case.

    The matter was heard by a single judge, Justice Alok Aradhe, in chambers. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal(for Tejpal) submitted that an interlocutory application seeking exemption from surrendering be listed on August 31. Till then, Tejpal has been granted four weeks by the High Court to surrender.

    On the other hand, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta(for the State of Goa) argued that the exemption application can only be listed if he has surrendered as per Order XX Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

    Mehta, relying on the Supreme Court judgments, stated that where the appeal has been filed, it shall state whether the convict has surrendered or not, and where he has not surrendered, the appeal should not be listed unless accompanied by an exemption application from surrendering. He added that the Court has power to do away with the requirement of surrender.

    Considering this, the Court stated that since Sibal has not addressed the merits of the application seeking exemption, it will be heard tomorrow.

    This comes days after the Goa Government also approached the Supreme Court for enhancement of punishment to life imprisonment while not challenging the finding of conviction.

    The Bombay High Court's Goa bench, comprising Justices Neela Gokhale and Amit Jamsandekar, had on August 6 overturned Tejpal's acquittal by the trial court and convicted him in the 2013 case. The court subsequently sentenced him to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment.

    The High Court had noted that the incident took place 13 years ago and that there was no report of any subsequent criminal misconduct by Tejpal. It consequently declined the Goa government's request for the maximum punishment of life imprisonment and imposed the minimum sentence prescribed for the rape conviction.

    The case arose from allegations that Tejpal sexually assaulted a junior colleague inside an elevator at a luxury hotel in Goa during an event organised by Tehelka in November 2013. The Goa Sessions Court had acquitted him in 2021, following which the State challenged the acquittal before the Bombay High Court.

    The High Court convicted Tejpal under provisions of the Indian Penal Code relating to rape, sexual harassment and assault with intent to disrobe. The rape provision under which he was convicted carried a minimum punishment of 10 years and permitted a sentence extending to life imprisonment.

    Case Details: TARUNJIT TEJPAL Vs THE STATE OF GOA|Diary No. 50909 / 2026

    Click Here To Read Order


    Gursimran Kaur Bakshi

    Gursimran Kaur Bakshi

    Gursimran is the Principal Correspondent with LiveLaw for the Supreme Court. She can be reached out at: simrankaurbakshi@livelaw-in.nujs.remotlog.com

    Next Story